Vacation News » Vacation & Leisure Real Estate Edition | By Peter Yesawich | November 26, 2008 11:44 AM ET
(ORLANDO, FL) - Seems like the bad news just keeps coming. And practically every indication from the field suggests that most in the travel industry (both domestic and international) will have to work harder in the months ahead to capture a meaningful share of the demand that's out there. Some have even questioned, appropriately, if there is sufficient life left in the marketplace to continue to invest in advertising and related marketing efforts given the strong headwinds. The answer, as corroborated through our continuous monitoring of the sentiments of American travelers, is yes, but increasingly for a more upscale demographic group.
As revealed in our most recent travelhorizons⢠survey (conducted in conjunction with the Travel Industry Association in Washington, DC the week of October 13th), fully seven out of ten (71%) active travelers in the U.S. intend to take a trip during the next 6 months, the same percentage we recorded the very same month last year (October, 2007). Furthermore, almost half (48% to be exact) stated their travel plans for the next 6 months would not change as a result of the turmoil in the financial markets. That's not to say there won't be some degradation of demand from more value-sensitive travelers, because there probably will be.
Not surprisingly, there is strong positive correlation between annual household income and near-term travel intentions (a robust 82% of those with annual incomes over $75,000 intend to travel during the next six months). Households with annual incomes below $75,000 are also significantly more likely to agree that "travel, in general, is too expensive" and that they are reevaluating their travel plans because of "household budget concerns."
What economic and social forces weigh most heavily on the minds of those who are planning to travel? The specter of high gasoline prices tops the list (thank goodness the price of oil has abated in recent weeks), but the depreciated value of one's primary residence appears to be less of a concern as revealed below: